6.9 C
Hamburg
Sunday, May 18, 2025
Home News Early skirmishes in IMO GHG debate from SIDS

Early skirmishes in IMO GHG debate from SIDS

Much of the damage from global warming will be first felt by the small island developing states, known as SIDS, but the early indications are that the island countries are divided in their support for the short-term greenhouse gas (GHG) measures thrashed out by the Intersessional Working Group in mid-October.

The Solomon and Marshall Islands have produced a paper for the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) 75 that explains their position, claiming that the proposals from October’s Intersessional Working Group were not far reaching enough and did not meet the Paris Agreement commitments.

The paper said, “The Fourth IMO GHG Study business-as-usual (BAU) scenarios projecting emissions of 90-130% of 2008 levels in 2050 are clear evidence that existing economic incentives are not sufficient and that new measures will be needed to meet even the least ambitious interpretation of the Initial Strategy [put forward by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in 2018].”

Both the island states believe that there is a real need for concern regarding the substantial increase in methane emissions in the calculation of GHG emissions. Carbon pricing was cited as one of the key missing elements that would show the IMO “is taking climate change seriously,” said an island representative.

“The Committee must revise the Initial Strategy and ensure it aligns with the 1.5°C temperature goal and related quantitative targets for international shipping that are consistent with the Paris Agreement; adopt short-term measures with stringencies that result in significant reductions in carbon intensity and that are aligned with the Initial Strategy’s stated commitments; and accelerate the debate on both mid- and long-term measures and ensure these are developed to be commensurate with the stringency and urgency which is clear in the climate science,” said the islands.

Not all island states were of the same mind, however. Another Pacific SIDS was more pragmatic about the Working Group’s proposals. The islanders acknowledged that there would be an increase in transportation costs as a result of decarbonisation measures, and that these would be felt disproportionately by island states.

However, the island supported the Working Group proposals, which it agreed were a compromise, the state representative said it was the “best deal on the table”.

Nick Savvides
Managing Editor





Latest Posts

Hapag-Lloyd applies GRI on Pakistan–Middle East trade lanes

Hapag-Lloyd has announced a General Rate Increase (GRI) from Pakistan to the Arabian Gulf, Saudi Arabia (Eastern and Western Provinces), Jordan and Yemen, and...

Wan Hai Lines debuts new Vietnam–Thailand–India direct route

Wan Hai Lines has announced a new direct service, the Tamil Nadu–Thailand Express (TTX) service, with the first vessel arriving at India's Chennai and...

Red Sea Eases, but Carriers Wary as Suez Canal Pushes for Return

As the haze begins to lift over the troubled waters of the Red Sea, the Suez Canal Authority (SCA) is carefully balancing reassurance with...

MSC and ZIM downsize joint Far East-US East Coast service network

In response to the recent changes in demand for cargo transport from Asia to the United States, MSC and ZIM have decided to adjust...

US sanctions target Iran-China oil trade, stirring waves across global shipping

As Washington ramps up its campaign to stifle Iranian oil revenues, a new chapter is unfolding in the ongoing tensions between the United States,...
error: Content is protected !!